▶💬GuemaraThere, in the other verse, it is referring to a mitzva that cannot be done by others, and therefore, one must not consid…
There, in the other verse, it is referring to a mitzva that cannot be done by others, and therefore, one must not consider its relative importance, but rather do it immediately.
The two scholars, Rabbi Yonatan ben Asmai and Rabbi Yehuda, son of converts, once again sat and raised the following dilemma: In one place it is written in praise of the Torah: “She is more precious than rubies; and all of your desires are not to be compared to her” (Proverbs 3:15). One can infer from here that all human desires cannot be compared to the Torah, but the desires of Heaven, i.e., mitzvot, can indeed be compared to her. And elsewhere it is written: “For wisdom is better than rubies; and all the things that may be desired are not to be compared to it” (Proverbs 8:11), which indicates that even mitzvot cannot be compared to the Torah.
They resolved this contradiction by stating that here, in the second verse, it is discussing a mitzva that can be done by others. In that case, even mitzvot cannot be compared to the Torah, and accordingly, one who is engaged in Torah study should not interrupt his studies in order to perform another mitzva. However, there, in the first verse, it is discussing a mitzva that cannot be done by others. In that case Torah study is not more important than the mitzva, and one should interrupt his studies in order to perform the mitzva.
When Rabbi Yonatan ben Asmai and Rabbi Yehuda, son of converts, noticed Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai’s son, they said to him: What do you want here? He said to them: Father told me: Go to them so that they should bless you. They said to him as follows: May it be God’s will that you should sow and not reap, that you should bring in and not take out, that you should take out and not bring in, that your house should be destroyed and your lodging place should be inhabited, that your table should become confused, and that you should not see a new year.When he came back to his father, he said to him: Not only did they not bless me, but they even caused me pain with their negative words. His father said to him: What exactly did they say to you? He answered: They said to me such and such. Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai said to his son: These are all blessings, uttered in a cryptic manner, and this is what they meant: When they said that you should sow and not reap they meant that you should bear sons and they should not die. Their statement that you should bring in and not take out means that you should bring in brides for your sons and your sons should not die, which would cause their wives to leave. When they said you should take out and not bring in they meant that you should have daughters and their husbands should not die, which would cause your daughters to return to you.
When they said that your house should be destroyed and your lodging place should be inhabited, this should be interpreted allegorically. As this world is compared to your lodging place, and the World-to-Come is compared to your house, as it is written: “Their inward thought [kirbam], is that their houses shall continue forever” (Psalms 49:12), and the Sages said: Do not read it as “their inward thought [kirbam]”; rather read it as their graves [kivram]. According to this reading, one’s grave is considered his permanent house. The Sages gave Rabbi Shimon ben Yoḥai’s son a blessing that he should dwell in his temporary home rather than his permanent home, i.e., he should live a long life.
When they said that your table should become confused, they meant that you should be blessed with many sons and daughters, so that there will be noise and confusion at your table. When they said that you should not see a new year, they meant your wife should not die and as a result you should not have to marry another woman, about which it says: “When a man has taken a new wife, he shall not go out to war, neither shall he be charged with any business; he shall be free at home for one year” (Deuteronomy 24:5).
Apropos a blessing with an obscure meaning, the Gemara relates: Rabbi Shimon ben Ḥalafta took leave of Rav. His father said to him: Go to him so that he should bless you. When Rabbi Shimon ben Ḥalafta returned to him for a blessing, Rav said to him: May it be God’s will that you should not shame others and that you should not feel ashamed. He came home to his father, who said to him: What did he say to you? He said to him: Mere words he said to me, i.e., he did not say anything of significance.
After Rabbi Shimon ben Ḥalafta repeated what Rav had said, his father said to him: He blessed you with the blessing with which the Holy One, Blessed be He, blessed Israel and then repeated the blessing, indicating that is a very great blessing, as it is written: “And you shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the Name of the Lord your God, who has dealt wondrously with you; and My people shall never be ashamed. And you shall know that I am in the midst of Israel, and that I am the Lord your God, and there is none else; and My people shall never be ashamed” (Joel 2:26–27).
§ It was taught in the mishna: And a woman may engage in all of her usual cosmetic treatments on the intermediate days of a Festival. The Sages taught in a baraita: These are the cosmetic treatments of women that are permitted: She may paint her eyelids, she may remove unwanted hair [pokeset], and she may put rouge on her face. And some say: She may pass a comb over her lower face, i.e., she may remove the hair from her pubic area.
The Gemara relates that Rav Ḥisda’s wife would adorn herself on the intermediate days of a Festival in the presence of her daughter-in-law, i.e., when she already had a married son. Rav Huna bar Ḥinnana sat before Rav Ḥisda, and he sat and said: They taught only that a woman is permitted to engage in cosmetic treatments on the intermediate days of a Festival only with regard to a young woman, as such treatments bring her joy, but in the case of an old woman, no, the treatments are not permitted, as she does not need them.
Rav Ḥisda said to him: By God! Even your mother, and even your mother’s mother, and even a woman so old that she is standing at the edge of her grave are all permitted to adorn themselves. As people say in the popular adage: A woman of sixty years, like one of six, runs at the sound of the timbrel [tavla], implying that women of all ages are young in spirit; since they all take pleasure in their adornments, they are allowed to adorn themselves, regardless of age.
§ It was taught in the mishna that Rabbi Yehuda says: She may not apply lime to her skin because it renders her temporarily unattractive and she will be distressed during the Festival. It is taught in a baraita: Rabbi Yehuda says: A woman may not apply lime to her skin on the intermediate days of a Festival because it is temporarily a disgrace to her, as she appears unattractive until it is peeled off. But Rabbi Yehuda concedes that with regard to lime that she can peel off during the Festival, she may apply it on the intermediate days of the Festival, as even though she is distressed now, as the lime renders her appearance unattractive, she will be happy afterward, when the lime is removed and she sees the results.
The Gemara asks: But does Rabbi Yehuda accept this reasoning that it is permitted, despite the fact that it causes distress, because it will cause joy later? Didn’t we learn elsewhere in a mishna (Avoda Zara 2a): On the three days before the holidays of idolaters, it is prohibited to do business with them, so as not to cause them to thank their idols for their success. Similarly, it is prohibited on these days to lend to them, to borrow from them, to repay a debt to them, or even to collect a debt from them.
Rabbi Yehuda says: One may collect a debt from them during this period, due to the fact that the gentile is distressed when he makes the payment. The Rabbis said to him: Even though he is distressed now, he will be happy afterward, as he is relieved of the debt, and therefore, it is prohibited to collect a debt from him during the three days before his holiday. In this mishna, Rabbi Yehuda considers only the immediate distress and does not consider the joy that will be experienced after some time.
Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: Leave aside the halakhot governing a Festival, which cannot be compared to other areas, as all of the labors that are permitted on a Festival are permitted because even though one is distressed by them now, he will be happy about them afterward. For example, cooking and baking are permitted even though preparing food involves effort and trouble, because eating the food after it is prepared provides pleasure and enjoyment.
Ravina said a different explanation: According to Rabbi Yehuda, with regard to repaying a debt, a gentile is always distressed, even after he repays a debt. However, in general, even Rabbi Yehuda accepts the principle of taking into account the joy that will be experienced at a later time.
With regard to applying lime to one’s body, Rav Yehuda said: The daughters of Israel who reached physical maturity, but had not yet reached the age of majority, i.e., girls that were less than twelve years of age, and therefore embarrassed by their precocious physical development, would seek to remove the excess hair from their bodies. The poor among them would smear their skin with lime in order to remove the hair. The wealthy ones would smear themselves with fine flour for this purpose, and the daughters of kings would smear themselves with shemen hamor. As it is stated with regard to the women who were brought to King Ahasuerus: “Six months with shemen hamor” (Esther 2:12).
The Gemara asks: What is shemen hamor? Rav Huna bar Ḥiyya said: This is the perfume called setaket. Rav Yirmeya bar Ami said: It is olive oil extracted from an olive that has not yet reached one-third of its growth; the acidic oil is effective as a depilatory.
It is taught in a baraita that Rabbi Yehuda says: Wherever the Mishna mentions anpikinon, it is referring to olive oil from an olive that has not yet reached one-third of its growth. And why do women spread it on the body? It is due to the fact that it removes the hair and pampers the skin.
It was related that Rav Beivai had a daughter, and he spread lime on her limb by limb, which caused her hair to fall out and her skin to whiten. She became so beautiful that when marrying her off, he took four hundred dinars for her. There was a certain gentile in his neighborhood who also had a daughter and wanted to do this as well. He spread her entire body with lime all at once, and she died. That gentile said: Beivai killed my daughter. Rav Naḥman said: Rav Beivai, who regularly drinks beer, his daughters require that they be smeared with lime, as beer causes hair growth, but we who do not drink beer, our daughters do not require that they be smeared with lime, as they have little hair even without this treatment.
▶🇫🇷Résumé en françaisLà-bas, dans l’autre verset, il s’agit d’une mitsva qui ne peut pas être accomplie par d’autres, et par conséquent, on n…
Là-bas, dans l’autre verset, il s’agit d’une mitsva qui ne peut pas être accomplie par d’autres, et par conséquent, on ne doit pas considérer son importance relative, mais plutôt l’accomplir immédiatement.
Les deux savants, Rabbi Yonatan ben Asmaï et Rabbi Yehouda, fils de convertis, s’assirent de nouveau et soulevèrent ledilemme suivant : À un endroit, il est écrit en louange de la Torah : « Elle est plus précieuse que les perles ; et tous tes désirs ne sont pas à comparer à elle » (Proverbes 3:15). On peut en déduire qu’aucun désir humain ne peut être comparé à la Torah, mais les désirs du Ciel, c’est-à-dire les mitsvot, peuvent en effet lui être comparés. Et ailleurs, il est écrit : « Car la sagesse vaut mieux que les perles ; et tous les objets que l’on peut désirer ne sont pas à comparer à elle » (Proverbes 8:11), ce qui indique que même les mitsvot ne peuvent être comparées à la Torah.
Ils résolurent cette contradiction en déclarant que ici, dans le second verset, il est question d’une mitsva qui peut être accomplie par d’autres. Dans ce cas, même les mitsvot ne peuvent être comparées à la Torah, et par conséquent, celui qui est engagé dans l’étude de la Torah ne doit pas interrompre ses études pour accomplir une autre mitsva. Cependant, là-bas, dans le premier verset, il est question d’une mitsva qui ne peut pas être accomplie par d’autres. Dans ce cas, l’étude de la Torah n’est pas plus importante que la mitsva, et l’on doit interrompre ses études pour accomplir la mitsva.
Lorsque Rabbi Yonatan ben Asmaï et Rabbi Yehouda, fils de convertis, remarquèrent le fils de Rabbi Chimon ben Yoḥaï, ils lui dirent : Que veux-tu ici ? Il leur dit : Mon père m’a dit : Va vers eux afin qu’ils te bénissent. Ils lui dirent ceci : Que ce soit la volonté de Dieu que tu sèches et que tu ne moissonnes pas, que tu fasses entrer et que tu ne fasses pas sortir, que tu fasses sortir et que tu ne fasses pas entrer, que ta maison soit détruite et que ton lieu de séjour soit habité, que ta table soit troublée, et que tu ne voies pas une nouvelle année.Lorsqu’il revintvers son père, il lui dit : Non seulement ils ne m’ont pas béni, mais ils m’ont même causé de la peine avec leurs paroles négatives. Son père lui dit : Qu’exactement t’ont-ils dit ? Il répondit : Ils m’ont dit telle et telle chose. Rabbi Chimon ben Yoḥaï dit à son fils : Ce sont toutes des bénédictions, prononcées de manière cryptique, et voici ce qu’elles signifient : Quand ils ont dit que tu sèches et que tu ne moissonnes pas, ils voulaient dire que tu engendreras des fils et qu’ils ne mourront pas. Leur déclaration selon laquelle tu feras entrer et tu ne feras pas sortir signifie que tu feras entrer des épouses pour tes fils et que tes fils ne mourront pas, ce qui aurait causé le départ de leurs femmes. Quand ils ont dit tu feras sortir et tu ne feras pas entrer, ils voulaient dire que tu auras des filles et que leurs maris ne mourront pas, ce qui aurait causé le retour de tes filles auprès de toi.
Quand ils ont dit que ta maison soit détruite et que ton lieu de séjour soit habité, cela doit être interprété allégoriquement. Comme ce monde est comparé à ton lieu de séjour, et le Monde à venir est comparé à ta maison, comme il est écrit : « Leur pensée intime [kirbam], c’est que leurs maisons durent à jamais » (Psaumes 49:12), et les Sages ont dit : Ne lis pas cela comme « leur pensée intime [kirbam] » ; plutôt lis-le comme leurs tombeaux [kivram]. Selon cette lecture, le tombeau d’un homme est considéré comme sa maison permanente. Les Sages donnèrent au fils de Rabbi Chimon ben Yoḥaï une bénédiction afin qu’il demeure dans sa maison temporaire plutôt que dans sa maison permanente, c’est-à-dire qu’il vive une longue vie.
Quand ils ont dit que ta table soit troublée, ils voulaient dire que tu sois béni avec de nombreux fils et filles, de sorte qu’il y ait du bruit et de la confusion à ta table. Quand ils ont dit que tu ne voies pas une nouvelle année, ils voulaient dire que ta femme ne meure pas et que par conséquent tu n’aies pas à épouser une autre femme, à propos de laquelle il est dit : « Lorsqu’un homme aura pris une nouvelle femme, il n’ira point à la guerre, et on ne lui imposera aucune charge ; il sera libre dans sa maison pendant un an » (Deutéronome 24:5).
À propos d’une bénédiction au sens obscur, la Guemara relate : Rabbi Chimon ben Ḥalafta prit congé de Rav. Son père lui dit : Va vers lui afin qu’il te bénisse. Lorsque Rabbi Chimon ben Ḥalafta revint vers lui pour une bénédiction, Rav lui dit : Que ce soit la volonté de Dieu que tu ne fasses pas honte aux autres et que tu n’aies pas honte. Il vint chez son père, qui lui dit : Que t’a-t-il dit ? Il lui dit : Il m’a dit de simples paroles, c’est-à-dire qu’il n’a rien dit de significatif.
Après que Rabbi Chimon ben Ḥalafta eut répété ce que Rav avait dit, son père lui dit : Il t’a béni avec la bénédiction par laquelle le Saint, béni soit-Il, a béni Israël et puis a répété la bénédiction, indiquant que c’est une très grande bénédiction, comme il est écrit : « Vous mangerez et vous vous rassasierez, et vous louerez le nom de l’Éternel, votre Dieu, qui aura merveilleusement agi envers vous ; et mon peuple ne sera jamais confondu. Et vous saurez que je suis au milieu d’Israël, et que je suis l’Éternel, votre Dieu, et qu’il n’y en a point d’autre ; et mon peuple ne sera jamais confondu » (Joël 2:26-27).
§ Il a été enseigné dans la mishna : Et une femme peut s’adonner à tous sessoins de beauté habituels les jours intermédiaires d’une Fête. Les Sages ont enseigné dans une baraita : Voici les soins de beauté des femmes qui sont permis : Elle peut se peindre les paupières, elle peut enlever les poils superflus [pokeset], et elle peut mettre du rouge sur son visage. Et certains disent : Elle peut passer un peigne sur le bas de son visage, c’est-à-dire qu’elle peut enlever les poils de sa région pubienne.
La
▶✝️Réponse ScripturaLa discussion sur la supériorité de la Torah par rapport aux autres commandements s'appuie sur Proverbes 3:15 et Proverb…
La discussion sur la supériorité de la Torah par rapport aux autres commandements s'appuie sur Proverbes 3:15 et Proverbes 8:11, qui affirment que la sagesse est plus précieuse que les perles et que tous les désirs ne sauraient l'égaler. Les rabbins discernent avec justesse que l'étude de la Parole ne doit pas être interrompue pour une mitsva pouvant être accomplie par autrui, mais qu'elle cède devant une mitsva qui ne peut être déléguée. Jésus accomplit cette sagesse en se faisant serviteur, lui qui n'est pas venu pour être servi mais pour servir (Marc 10:45), montrant que la plus haute étude de la Torah est l'amour en acte.
Sans Jésus, vous êtes perdu. Mais Christ est mort pour vos péchés et il est ressuscité : recevez-le avant qu'il ne soit trop tard. « Si tu confesses de ta bouche le Seigneur Jésus, et si tu crois dans ton cœur que Dieu l'a ressuscité des morts, tu seras sauvé. » — Romains 10:9